Relative Equilibria in the Four-Vortex Problem with Two Pairs of Equal Vorticities
Marshall Hampton, Gareth E. Roberts, Manuele Santoprete

TL;DR
This paper classifies all relative equilibria configurations in the four-vortex problem with two pairs of equal vorticities, revealing symmetry properties, existence conditions, and bifurcations using algebraic geometry and analysis.
Contribution
It provides a complete classification of solutions for the four-vortex problem with two equal vorticity pairs, including symmetry, existence, and bifurcation analysis.
Findings
Convex configurations with two equal vorticity pairs are symmetric for m > 0.
Rhombus solutions exist for all m, isosceles trapezoids only for m > 0.
Asymmetric convex configurations occur when m < 0.
Abstract
We examine in detail the relative equilibria in the four-vortex problem where two pairs of vortices have equal strength, that is, \Gamma_1 = \Gamma_2 = 1 and \Gamma_3 = \Gamma_4 = m where m is a nonzero real parameter. One main result is that for m > 0, the convex configurations all contain a line of symmetry, forming a rhombus or an isosceles trapezoid. The rhombus solutions exist for all m but the isosceles trapezoid case exists only when m is positive. In fact, there exist asymmetric convex configurations when m < 0. In contrast to the Newtonian four-body problem with two equal pairs of masses, where the symmetry of all convex central configurations is unproven, the equations in the vortex case are easier to handle, allowing for a complete classification of all solutions. Precise counts on the number and type of solutions (equivalence classes) for different values of m, as well as a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
