Evolution of precipitate morphology during heat treatment and its implications for the superconductivity in KxFe1.6+ySe2 single crystals
Y. Liu, Q. Xing, K. W. Dennis, R. W. McCallum, and T. A. Lograsso

TL;DR
This study explores how the morphology of precipitates in KxFe1.6+ySe2 crystals affects superconductivity, revealing that heat treatments can reversibly alter the superconducting network structure and improve shielding fractions.
Contribution
It demonstrates that heat treatment controls precipitate morphology and superconductivity in KxFe1.6+ySe2, highlighting the phase separation driven by iron vacancy order-disorder transition.
Findings
Superconducting phase forms a network in quenched samples.
Furnace cooling leads to isolated chain-like precipitates.
Post-annealing and quenching recover the superconducting network.
Abstract
We study the relationship between precipitate morphology and superconductivity in KxFe1.6+ySe2 single crystals grown by self-flux method. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) measurements revealed that superconducting phase forms a network in the samples quenched above iron vacancy order-disorder transition temperature Ts. For the samples obtained by natural cooling down to room temperature in the furnace, referred to as furnace cooling, superconducting phase aggregates into micrometer-sized rectangular bars and aligns as disconnected chains. Accompanying this change in morphology the superconducting shielding fraction is strongly reduced in the furnace-cooling samples. By post-annealing above Ts followed by quenching in room temperature water, the network recovers with superconducting shielding fraction approaching 80%. A reversible change from network to bar chains was realized by a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
