The Atlas3D project - XV. Benchmark for early-type galaxies scaling relations from 260 dynamical models: mass-to-light ratio, dark matter, Fundamental Plane and Mass Plane
Michele Cappellari, Nicholas Scott, Katherine Alatalo, Leo Blitz,, Maxime Bois, Frederic Bournaud, M. Bureau, Alison F. Crocker, Roger L., Davies, Timothy A. Davis, P. T. de Zeeuw, Pierre-Alain Duc, Eric Emsellem,, Sadegh Khochfar, Davor Krajnovic, Harald Kuntschner

TL;DR
This study uses detailed dynamical models of 260 early-type galaxies to analyze their mass-to-light ratios, dark matter content, and scaling relations, revealing tight correlations and deviations from virial expectations.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive dynamical modeling framework for early-type galaxies, quantifying dark matter fractions and refining scaling relations like the Fundamental Plane and Mass Plane.
Findings
Median dark matter fraction within Re is 13%.
Mass Plane has 19% observed rms scatter, 11% intrinsic.
The (M/L)-sigma_e relation is (M/L) ∝ sigma_e^0.72.
Abstract
We study the volume-limited and nearly mass selected (stellar mass M>6*10^9 Msun) Atlas3D sample of 260 early-type galaxies. We construct detailed axisymmetric dynamical models (JAM), which allow for orbital anisotropy, include a dark matter halo, and reproduce in detail both the galaxy images and the high-quality integral-field stellar kinematics. We derive accurate total M/L and dark matter fractions f_DM, within a sphere of radius r=Re. We also measure the stellar M/L and derive a median dark matter fraction f_DM=13%. We find that the thin two-dimensional subset spanned by galaxies in the (M_JAM,sigma_e,R_e) coordinates system, which we call the Mass Plane (MP) has an observed rms scatter of 19% and an intrinsic one of 11%. The MP satisfies the scalar virial relation M_JAM sigma_e^2 R_e within our tight errors. However, the details of how both Re and sigma_e are determined are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
