Chemical Analysis of a Diffuse Cloud along a Line of Sight Toward W51: Molecular Fraction and Cosmic-Ray Ionization Rate
Nick Indriolo, D. A. Neufeld, M. Gerin, T. R. Geballe, J. H. Black, K., M. Menten, J. R. Goicoechea

TL;DR
This study combines observations of OH+, H2O+, and H3+ molecules to analyze the chemical composition and cosmic-ray ionization rates in a diffuse cloud near W51, revealing lower-than-expected formation efficiencies.
Contribution
First comprehensive chemical analysis using all three molecules to determine molecular hydrogen fraction and cosmic-ray ionization rates in a diffuse cloud.
Findings
Cosmic-ray ionization rate of H in the cloud: (4.8±3.4)×10^-16 s^-1
Efficiency factor for OH+ formation: 0.07±0.04, lower than models predict
Combined molecular data improve understanding of cosmic-ray interactions in diffuse clouds
Abstract
Absorption lines from the molecules OH+, H2O+, and H3+ have been observed in a diffuse molecular cloud along a line of sight near W51 IRS2. We present the first chemical analysis that combines the information provided by all three of these species. Together, OH+ and H2O+ are used to determine the molecular hydrogen fraction in the outskirts of the observed cloud, as well as the cosmic-ray ionization rate of atomic hydrogen. H3+ is used to infer the cosmic-ray ionization rate of H2 in the molecular interior of the cloud, which we find to be zeta_2=(4.8+-3.4)x10^-16 per second. Combining the results from all three species we find an efficiency factor---defined as the ratio of the formation rate of OH+ to the cosmic-ray ionization rate of H---of epsilon=0.07+-0.04, much lower than predicted by chemical models. This is an important step in the future use of OH+ and H2O+ on their own as…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
