Low-mass planets in nearly inviscid disks: Numerical treatment
Wilhelm Kley (1), Tobias W. A. Mueller (1), Stefan M. Kolb (1), Pablo, Benitez-Llambay (2), Frederic Masset (3) ((1) University of Tuebingen, (2), Universidad Nacional de Cordoba, (3) Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico)

TL;DR
This paper investigates the numerical methods for simulating low-mass planet interactions with nearly inviscid disks, validating the FARGO algorithm's accuracy and exploring 2D and 3D simulation differences.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of numerical resolution requirements and confirms the FARGO algorithm's validity for low-mass planet simulations in nearly inviscid disks.
Findings
FARGO yields correct results with reduced computational time.
Resolution requirements depend on the disk's pressure scale height.
2D and 3D torque densities agree with proper vertical averaging.
Abstract
Embedded planets disturb the density structure of the ambient disk and gravitational back-reaction will induce possibly a change in the planet's orbital elements. The accurate determination of the forces acting on the planet requires careful numerical analysis. Recently, the validity of the often used fast orbital advection algorithm (FARGO) has been put into question, and special numerical resolution and stability requirements have been suggested. In this paper we study the process of planet-disk interaction for small mass planets of a few Earth masses, and reanalyze the numerical requirements to obtain converged and stable results. One focus lies on the applicability of the FARGO-algorithm. Additionally, we study the difference of two and three-dimensional simulations, compare global with local setups, as well as isothermal and adiabatic conditions. We study the influence of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
