Modelling the Galactic distribution of free electrons

TL;DR

This study evaluates and improves models of the Milky Way's free electron distribution using pulsar data, introducing new models and assessing their predictive accuracy for pulsar dispersion measures.

Contribution

The paper introduces four new models of galactic free electron distribution and compares their performance with existing models using recent pulsar data.

Findings

Most models predict DMs within a factor of 1.5-2 for 75% of lines of sight.

Updated Taylor & Cordes model with extended thick disk performs best.

Local ISM features cause deviations in DM predictions.

Abstract

In this paper we test 8 models of the free electron distribution in the Milky Way that have been published previously, and we introduce 4 additional models that explore the parameter space of possible models further. These new models consist of a simple exponential thick disk model, and updated versions of the models by Taylor & Cordes and Cordes & Lazio with more extended thick disks. The final model we introduce uses the observed H-alpha intensity as a proxy for the total electron column density, also known as the dispersion measure (DM). We use the latest available data sets of pulsars with accurate distances (through parallax measurements or association with globular clusters) to optimise the parameters in these models. In the process of fitting a new scale height for the thick disk in the model by Cordes & Lazio we discuss why this thick disk cannot be replaced by the thick disk that Gaensler et al. advocated in a recent paper. In the second part of our paper we test how well the different models can predict the DMs of these pulsars at known distances. Almost all models perform well, in that they predict DMs within a factor of 1.5-2 of the observed DMs for about 75% of the lines of sight. This is somewhat surprising since the models we tested range from very simple models that only contain a single exponential thick disk to very complex models like the model by Cordes & Lazio. We show that the model by Taylor & Cordes that we updated with a more extended thick disk consistently performs better than the other models we tested. Finally, we analyse which sightlines have DMs that prove difficult to predict by most models, which indicates the presence of local features in the ISM between us and the pulsar. (abridged)