Precision measurement of the neutrino velocity with the ICARUS detector in the CNGS beam
M. Antonello, B. Baibussinov, F. Boffelli, P. Benetti, E. Calligarich,, N. Canci, S. Centro, A. Cesana, K. Cieslik, D. B. Cline, A. G. Cocco, A., Dabrowska, D. Dequal, A. Dermenev, R. Dolfini, C. Farnese, A. Fava, A., Ferrari, G. Fiorillo, D. Gibin, S. Gninenko, A. Guglielmi

TL;DR
This study precisely measured neutrino velocity over a long baseline using an improved timing system, confirming neutrinos travel at the speed of light within experimental uncertainties.
Contribution
The paper presents a highly accurate neutrino time of flight measurement with enhanced synchronization techniques and a tightly bunched beam, reducing previous uncertainties.
Findings
Neutrino velocity is consistent with the speed of light.
Improved timing synchronization reduced systematic errors.
Measured time difference is within 1 ns of expected light speed.
Abstract
During May 2012, the CERN-CNGS neutrino beam has been operated for two weeks for a total of 1.8 10^17 pot in bunched mode, with a 3 ns narrow width proton beam bunches, separated by 100 ns. This tightly bunched beam structure allows a very accurate time of flight measurement of neutrinos from CERN to LNGS on an event-by-event basis. Both the ICARUS-T600 PMT-DAQ and the CERN-LNGS timing synchronization have been substantially improved for this campaign, taking ad-vantage of additional independent GPS receivers, both at CERN and LNGS as well as of the deployment of the "White Rabbit" protocol both at CERN and LNGS. The ICARUS-T600 detector has collected 25 beam-associated events; the corresponding time of flight has been accurately evaluated, using all different time synchronization paths. The measured neutrino time of flight is compatible with the arrival of all events with speed…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
