Using the Bright Ultra-Hard XMM-Newton Survey to define an IR selection of luminous AGN based on WISE colours
S. Mateos, A. Alonso-Herrero, F. J. Carrera, A. Blain, M. G. Watson,, X. Barcons, V. Braito, P. Severgnini, J. L. Donley, D. Stern

TL;DR
This paper develops a reliable mid-infrared color selection method for luminous AGN using WISE data, based on a large X-ray survey, achieving high completeness and efficiency especially for high-luminosity AGN.
Contribution
The study introduces a new MIR color wedge for AGN selection that accounts for photometric errors and SED deviations, validated with the extensive BUXS X-ray survey data.
Findings
Achieves 97.1% completeness for high-luminosity type-1 AGN
Identifies 2755 AGN candidates with high reliability in WISE data
Including the 22um band does not improve selection due to depth and star formation contamination.
Abstract
We present a highly complete and reliable mid-infrared (MIR) colour selection of luminous AGN candidates using the 3.4, 4.6, and 12 um bands of the WISE survey. The MIR colour wedge was defined using the wide-angle Bright Ultra-Hard XMM-Newton Survey (BUXS), one of the largest complete flux-limited samples of bright (f(4.5-10 keV)>6x10^{-14} erg cm^-2 s^-1) "ultra-hard" (4.5-10 keV) X-ray selected AGN to date. BUXS includes 258 objects detected over a total sky area of 44.43 deg^2 of which 251 are spectroscopically identified and classified, with 145 being type-1 AGN and 106 type-2 AGN. Our technique is designed to select objects with red MIR power-law spectral energy distributions (SED) in the three shortest bands of WISE and properly accounts for the errors in the photometry and deviations of the MIR SEDs from a pure power-law. The completeness of the MIR selection is a strong…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
