Response to Comment of Shukla and Akbari-Moghanjoughi
J. Vranjes, B. P. Pandey, and S. Poedts

TL;DR
This paper is a second response defending a quantum plasma description, emphasizing the importance of common sense in interpreting quantum effects in plasma physics.
Contribution
It provides a rebuttal to critiques of quantum plasma models, advocating for a balanced and sensible approach to quantum plasma theory.
Findings
Reaffirms the validity of quantum plasma descriptions
Highlights the need for common sense in quantum interpretations
Strengthens the theoretical foundation of quantum plasma physics
Abstract
Shukla and Akbari-Moghanjoughi have {\it corrected} their Comment (see their version 1 on `arXiv:1207.7029v1) to EPL on our work [1] after receiving our Response from the Editors of EPL. We have a pleasant duty at hand to present our second Response to their second version of the Comment. It is hoped that this response adds strength to our plea {\it for a common sense} [1] on quantum description of plasmas.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
