Three-integral multi-component dynamical models and simulations of the nuclear star cluster in NGC 4244
F. De Lorenzi (1), M. Hartmann (2), V. P. Debattista (3,4), A. C. Seth, (5), O. Gerhard (6) ((1) Zuercher Hochschule fuer Angewandte Wissenschaften,, Switzerland, (2) Astronomisches Rechen-Institut, Zentrum fuer Astronomie der, Universitaet Heidelberg, Germany

TL;DR
This study models the nuclear star cluster in NGC 4244 using adaptive optics data, dynamical models, and N-body simulations to determine its mass, structure, and stability, including the potential presence of an intermediate mass black hole.
Contribution
It introduces improved axisymmetric two-component dynamical models of the nuclear star cluster in NGC 4244, incorporating rotation, anisotropy, and black hole mass constraints, and tests their stability through N-body simulations.
Findings
Mass of nuclear star cluster: ~1.6 x 10^7 M_sun within 42.4 pc.
Models with black hole up to 5.0 x 10^5 M_sun are consistent with data.
Cluster is stable against non-axisymmetric perturbations and sensitive to star cluster accretion.
Abstract
Adaptive optics observations of the flattened nuclear star cluster in the nearby edge-on spiral galaxy NGC 4244 using the Gemini Near-Infrared Integral Field Spectrograph (NIFS) have revealed clear rotation. Using these kinematics plus 2MASS photometry we construct a series of axisymmetric two-component particle dynamical models with our improved version of NMAGIC, a flexible Chi^2-made-to-measure code. The models consist of a nuclear cluster disc embedded within a spheroidal particle population. We find a mass for the nuclear star cluster of M=1.6^+0.5_-0.2 x 10^7 M_sun within ~42.4 pc (2"). We also explore the presence of an intermediate mass black hole and show that models with a black hole as massive as M_bh = 5.0 x 10^5 M_sun are consistent with the available data. Regardless of whether a black hole is present or not, the nuclear cluster is vertically anisotropic (beta_z < 0), as…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
