Quantum measurement and the first law of thermodynamics: the energy cost of measurement is the work value of the acquired information
Kurt Jacobs

TL;DR
This paper investigates the fundamental energy costs of quantum measurement, clarifying that real measurement devices incur costs similar to heat engines, and that measurement's energy expense is tied to the work value of information.
Contribution
It clarifies the true energy cost of quantum measurement, showing that real devices always pay a cost equivalent to a heat engine, resolving apparent contradictions in Maxwell's demon scenarios.
Findings
Real measurement devices require energy costs similar to heat engines.
Measurement cost is linked to the work value of acquired information.
Zero-temperature reservoirs would eliminate measurement energy costs.
Abstract
The energy cost of measurement is an interesting fundamental question, and may have profound implications for quantum technologies. In the context of Maxwell's demon, it is often stated that measurement has no minimum energy cost, while information has a work value, even though these statements can appear contradictory. However, as we elucidate, these statements do no refer to the cost paid by the measuring device. Here we show that it is only when a measuring device has access to a zero temperature reservoir - that is, never - that the measurement requires no energy. All real measuring devices pay the cost that a heat engine pays to obtain the work value of the information they acquire.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
