Super-luminous supernovae: 56Ni power versus magnetar radiation
Luc Dessart, D. John Hillier, Roni Waldman, Eli Livne, Stephane, Blondin

TL;DR
This paper compares the power sources of super-luminous supernovae, finding that magnetar radiation better explains their spectral features than nickel decay from pair-instability supernova models.
Contribution
It demonstrates that magnetar energy injection can reproduce the observed spectra of super-luminous supernovae more accurately than pair-instability supernova models.
Findings
PISN models produce red spectra inconsistent with observations.
Magnetar energy injection results in blue, broad-lined spectra matching super-luminous SNe.
A magnetar-influenced model reproduces diverse spectral morphologies.
Abstract
Much uncertainty surrounds the origin of super-luminous supernovae (SNe). Motivated by the discovery of the Type Ic SN2007bi, we study its proposed association with a pair-instability SN (PISN). We compute stellar-evolution models for primordial ~200Msun stars, simulating the implosion/explosion due to the pair-production instability, and use them as inputs for detailed non-LTE time-dependent radiative-transfer simulations that include non-local energy deposition and non-thermal processes. We retrieve the basic morphology of PISN light curves from red-supergiant, blue-supergiant, and Wolf-Rayet (WR) star progenitors. Although we confirm that a progenitor 100Msun helium core (PISN model He100) fits well the SN2007bi light curve, the low ratios of its kinetic energy and 56Ni mass to the ejecta mass, similar to standard core-collapse SNe, conspire to produce cool photospheres, red spectra…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
