The Keck Aperture Masking Experiment: Dust Enshrouded Red Giants
T. D. Blasius (1,2), J. D. Monnier (1), P. G. Tuthill (3), W. C., Danchi (4), and M. Anderson (1) ((1) Department of Astronomy, University of, Michigan, (2) Department of Physics, California Institute of Technology,, Pasadena, CA USA, (3) University of Sydney, Sydney Australia

TL;DR
This study used the Keck Aperture Masking Experiment to spatially resolve dust formation regions around 20 dust-enshrouded AGB stars, revealing asymmetric dust shells and measuring sublimation temperatures, advancing understanding of dust-driven winds in evolved stars.
Contribution
First high-resolution near-infrared imaging of multiple dust-enshrouded AGB stars, providing new insights into dust shell asymmetries and sublimation temperatures across different dust types.
Findings
45% of targets show measurable elongations indicating asymmetric dust shells.
Sublimation temperatures are around 1130 K for silicates and 1170 K for amorphous carbon.
Inner dust shell temperature profiles change with optical thickness, possibly due to dust clumping at high mass-loss rates.
Abstract
While the importance of dusty asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars to galactic chemical enrichment is widely recognised, a sophisticated understanding of the dust formation and wind-driving mechanisms has proven elusive due in part to the difficulty in spatially-resolving the dust formation regions themselves. We have observed twenty dust-enshrouded AGB stars as part of the Keck Aperture Masking Experiment, resolving all of them in multiple near-infrared bands between 1.5 microns and 3.1 microns. We find 45% of the targets to show measurable elongations that, when correcting for the greater distances of the targets, would correspond to significantly asymmetric dust shells on par with the well-known cases of IRC+10216 or CIT6. Using radiative transfer models, we find the sublimation temperature of 1130 +- 90 K and 1170 +- 60 K for silicates and amorphous carbon respectively, both somewhat…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
