Self-Consistency Requirements of the Renormalization Group for Setting the Renormalization Scale
Stanley J. Brodsky, Xing-Gang Wu

TL;DR
This paper discusses the constraints of the renormalization group on setting the renormalization scale in QCD, comparing the Principle of Minimal Sensitivity and the Principle of Maximum Conformality, and demonstrating the latter's consistency with RG invariance.
Contribution
It introduces the self-consistency requirements of the RG and shows that the PMC method satisfies all these properties, providing scheme-independent predictions.
Findings
PMC satisfies RG invariance properties including reflexivity, symmetry, transitivity.
PMC yields scale-fixed, scheme-independent predictions at finite order.
PMC predictions are highly independent of initial scale choices.
Abstract
In conventional treatments, predictions from fixed-order perturbative QCD calculations cannot be fixed with certainty due to ambiguities in the choice of the renormalization scale as well as the renormalization scheme. In this paper we present a general discussion of the constraints of the renormalization group (RG) invariance on the choice of the renormalization scale. We adopt the RG based equations, which incorporate the scheme parameters, for a general exposition of RG invariance, since they simultaneously express the invariance of physical observables under both the variation of the renormalization scale and the renormalization scheme parameters. We then discuss the self-consistency requirements of the RG, such as reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity, which must be satisfied by the scale-setting method. The Principle of Minimal Sensitivity (PMS) requires the slope of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
