The Derivation, Properties and Value of Kepler's Combined Differential Photometric Precision
Jessie L. Christiansen, Jon M. Jenkins, Thomas S. Barclay, Christopher, J. Burke, Douglas A. Caldwell, Bruce D. Clarke, Jie Li, Shawn Seader, Jeffrey, C. Smith, Martin C. Stumpe, Peter Tenenbaum, Susan E. Thompson, Joseph D., Twicken, Jeffrey Van Cleve

TL;DR
This paper explains how Kepler's Combined Differential Photometric Precision (CDPP) is calculated, its properties, and how it can be used to evaluate survey completeness and detectability of Earth-like planets.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed method for calculating and tabulating Kepler's CDPP, providing a valuable resource for assessing survey completeness and planet detection capabilities.
Findings
Provided rms CDPP tables for all Kepler targets
Analyzed the distribution of rms CDPP in Quarter 3 data
Demonstrated how to use CDPP to estimate target completeness
Abstract
The Kepler Mission is searching for Earth-size planets orbiting solar-like stars by simultaneously observing >160,000 stars to detect sequences of transit events in the photometric light curves. The Combined Differential Photometric Precision (CDPP) is the metric that defines the ease with which these weak terrestrial transit signatures can be detected. An understanding of CDPP is invaluable for evaluating the completeness of the Kepler survey and inferring the underlying planet population. This paper describes how the Kepler CDPP is calculated, and introduces tables of rms CDPP on a per-target basis for 3-, 6-, and 12-hour transit durations, which are now available for all Kepler observations. Quarter 3 is the first typical set of observations at the nominal length and completeness for a quarter, from 2009 September 18 to 2009 December 16, and we examine the properties of the rms CDPP…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
