A brief note on epistemic interpretations and the Kochen-Specker theorem
O. J. E. Maroney

TL;DR
This paper explores how the Kochen-Specker theorem can be adapted to demonstrate limitations on maximally epistemic interpretations of quantum theory, building on recent no-go theorems and quantum contextuality proofs.
Contribution
It shows a new way to derive a no 'maximally epistemic' theorem from the Kochen-Specker theorem, extending the understanding of epistemic interpretations.
Findings
Kochen-Specker theorem can be used to limit epistemic interpretations
The derived theorem is more limited than previous no-go theorems
Connections between contextuality proofs and epistemic interpretations are clarified
Abstract
One of the recent no-go theorems on \Psi-epistemic interpretations of quantum proves that there are no 'maximally epistemic' interpretations of quantum theory. The proof utilises similar arrangements to Clifton's quantum contextuality proof and has parallels to Harrigan and Rudolph's quantum deficiency no-go theorem, itself based on the Kochen-Specker quantum contextuality proof. This paper shows how the Kochen-Specker theorem can also be turned into a no 'maximally epistemic' theorem, but of a more limited kind.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
