Measurement of zero degree inclusive photon energy spectra for $\sqrt{s}=$ 900 GeV proton-proton collisions at LHC
O. Adriani, L. Bonechi, M. Bongi, G. Castellini, R. D'Alessandro, K., Fukatsu, M. Haguenauer, T. Iso, Y. Itow, K. Kasahara, K. Kawade, T. Mase, K., Masuda, H. Menjo, G. Mitsuka, Y. Muraki, K. Noda, P. Papini, A.-L. Perrot, S., Ricciarini, T. Sako, K. Suzuki, T. Suzuki, K. Taki

TL;DR
This paper reports measurements of inclusive photon energy spectra in very forward proton-proton collisions at 900 GeV at the LHC, comparing results with various hadronic interaction models to evaluate their accuracy.
Contribution
First measurement of forward photon spectra at 900 GeV at the LHC, providing data to test and improve hadronic interaction models used in cosmic-ray physics.
Findings
EPOS 1.99 and SIBYLL 2.1 models agree reasonably with spectral shape
Most models underestimate the cross-section above 300 GeV
Models show similar discrepancies at 7 TeV and 900 GeV energies
Abstract
The inclusive photon energy spectra measured by the Large Hadron Collider forward (LHCf) experiment in the very forward region of LHC proton-proton collisions at 900 GeV are reported. The results from the analysis of 0.30 of data collected in May 2010 in the two pseudorapidity regions of and are compared with the predictions of the hadronic interaction models DPMJET 3.04, EPOS 1.99, PYTHIA 8.145, QGSJET I -.1em I-03 and SIBYLL 2.1, which are widely used in ultra-high-energy cosmic-ray experiments. EPOS 1.99 and SYBILL 2.1 show a reasonable agreement with the spectral shape of the experimental data, whereas they predict lower cross-sections than the data. The other models, DPMJET 3.04, QGSJET I -.1em I-03 and PYTHIA 8.145, are in good agreement with the data below 300 GeV but predict harder energy spectra than the data…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
