The evolution of the mass-size relation for early type galaxies from z~1 to the present: dependence on environment, mass-range and detailed morphology

TL;DR

This study investigates how early-type galaxy sizes evolve since z~1, revealing that size growth depends on galaxy morphology and mass, but not significantly on environment, with different behaviors observed for ellipticals and lenticulars.

Contribution

It provides a detailed analysis of size evolution for early-type galaxies across different morphologies, masses, and environments, highlighting the complex dependencies and challenging some hierarchical model predictions.

Findings

Massive ellipticals approximately doubled in size since z=1.

Lenticular galaxies show a ~60% size increase independent of mass.

Size growth does not depend on environment within the explored halo mass range.

Abstract

[abridged] We study the dependence of the galaxy size evolution on morphology, stellar mass and large scale environment for a sample of 298 group and 384 field quiescent early-type galaxies from the COSMOS survey, selected from z~1 to the present, and with masses $log(M/M_\odot)>10.5$. The galaxy size growth depends on galaxy mass and early-type galaxy morphology, e.g., elliptical galaxies evolve differently than lenticular galaxies. At the low mass end -$10.5<Log(M/M_\odot)<11$, ellipticals do not show strong size growth from $z\sim1$ to the present (10% to 30% depending on the morphological classification). On the other end, massive ellipticals -log(M/M_\odot)>11.2$- approximately doubled their size. Interestingly, lenticular galaxies display different behavior: they appear more compact on average and they do show a size growth of \sim60% since z=1 independent of stellar mass. We compare our results with state-of-the art semi-analytic models. While major and minor mergers can account for most of the galaxy size growth, we find that with present data and the theoretical uncertainties in the modeling we cannot state clear evidence favoring either merger or mass loss via quasar and/or stellar winds as the primary mechanism driving the evolution. The galaxy mass--size relation and the size growth do not depend on environment in the halo mass range explored in this work (field to group mass $log(M_h/M_\odot)<14$), i.e., group and field galaxies follow the same trends, which is at variance with predictions from current hierarchical models that show a clear dependence of size growth on halo mass for massive ellipticals -$log(M_*/M_\odot)>11.2$.