Constraints on mass loss and self-enrichment scenarios for the globular clusters of the Fornax dSph
S. S. Larsen (1), J. Strader (2, 3), J. P. Brodie (4) ((1) Radboud, University Nijmegen, The Netherlands, (2) Harvard CfA, USA, (3) Michigan, State University, USA, (4) UCO/Lick Observatory, USA)

TL;DR
This paper investigates the metallicity and star formation history of globular clusters in the Fornax dwarf galaxy, revealing challenges to existing self-enrichment models and suggesting unique formation scenarios.
Contribution
It provides new constraints on globular cluster formation and evolution in dwarf galaxies, highlighting discrepancies with traditional self-enrichment theories.
Findings
Four of five GCs are extremely metal-poor with [Fe/H]<-2
High ratio of metal-poor GCs to field stars in Fornax
Chemical abundance patterns similar to Milky Way GCs
Abstract
Recently, high-dispersion spectroscopy has demonstrated conclusively that four of the five globular clusters (GCs) in the Fornax dwarf spheroidal galaxy are very metal-poor with [Fe/H]<-2. The remaining cluster, Fornax 4, has [Fe/H]=-1.4. This is in stark contrast to the field star metallicity distribution which shows a broad peak around [Fe/H]=-1 with only a few percent of the stars having [Fe/H]<-2. If we only consider stars and clusters with [Fe/H]<-2 we thus find an extremely high GC specific frequency, SN=400, implying by far the highest ratio of GCs to field stars known anywhere. We estimate that about 1/5-1/4 of all stars in the Fornax dSph with [Fe/H]<-2 belong to the four most metal-poor GCs. These GCs could, therefore, at most have been a factor of 4-5 more massive initially. Yet, the Fornax GCs appear to share the same anomalous chemical abundance patterns known from Milky…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
