The Unusual Temporal and Spectral Evolution of SN2011ht. II. Peculiar Type IIn or Impostor?
Roberta M. Humphreys, Kris Davidson, Terry J. Jones, R. W. Pogge,, Skyler H. Grammer, Jos\'e L. Prieto, P. W. A. Roming, and T. A. Pritchard

TL;DR
SN2011ht likely represents a giant eruption driven by super-Eddington radiation pressure rather than a true supernova, based on its spectral evolution, wind velocities, and energy estimates, challenging its classification as a core-collapse event.
Contribution
This study provides detailed spectral and kinematic analysis of SN2011ht, arguing it is a super-Eddington eruption rather than a genuine supernova, which is a novel reinterpretation.
Findings
Spectral evolution from hot to cool dense wind observed.
Wind speeds identified at 500-900 km/s, no evidence above 1000 km/s.
Total energy estimated at ~2 x 10^49 ergs, less than a true supernova.
Abstract
SN2011ht has been described both as a true supernova and as an impostor. In this paper, we conclude that it does not match some basic expectations for a core-collapse event. We discuss SN2011ht's spectral evolution from a hot dense wind to a cool dense wind, followed by the post-plateau appearance of a faster low density wind during a rapid decline in luminosity. We identify a slow dense wind expanding at only 500--600 km/s, present throughout the eruption. A faster wind speed V ~ 900 km/s may be identified with a second phase of the outburst. There is no direct or significant evidence for any flow speed above 1000 km/s; the broad asymmetric wings of Balmer emission lines in the hot wind phase were due to Thomson scattering, not bulk motion. We estimate a mass loss rate of order 0.04 Msun/yr during the hot dense wind phase of the event. There is no evidence that the kinetic energy…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
