Observed versus modelled u,g,r,i,z-band photometry of local galaxies - Evaluation of model performance
K. S. Alexander Hansson, Thorsten Lisker, Eva K. Grebel

TL;DR
This study evaluates how well different stellar population models reproduce SDSS u,g,r,i,z-band photometry of local galaxies, highlighting model differences and the potential to constrain galaxy properties from photometry.
Contribution
It systematically compares multiple stellar population models against observed galaxy colors and properties, emphasizing the importance of model choice and limitations.
Findings
Models show significant differences and some occupy unobserved regions in color space.
Photometry can constrain star formation history, metallicity, and dust content.
Degeneracies exist in certain color regions due to overlapping model predictions.
Abstract
We test how well available stellar population models can reproduce observed u,g,r,i,z-band photometry of the local galaxy population (0.02<=z<=0.03) as probed by the SDSS. Our study is conducted from the perspective of a user of the models, who has observational data in hand and seeks to convert them into physical quantities. Stellar population models for galaxies are created by synthesizing star formations histories and chemical enrichments using single stellar populations from several groups (Starburst99, GALAXEV, Maraston2005, GALEV). The role of dust is addressed through a simplistic, but observationally motivated, dust model that couples the amplitude of the extinction to the star formation history, metallicity and the viewing angle. Moreover, the influence of emission lines is considered (for the subset of models for which this component is included). The performance of the models…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
