Second Season QUIET Observations: Measurements of the CMB Polarization Power Spectrum at 95 GHz
QUIET Collaboration: D. Araujo, C. Bischoff, A. Brizius, I. Buder, Y., Chinone, K. Cleary, R. N. Dumoulin, A. Kusaka, R. Monsalve, S. K. N{\ae}ss,, L. B. Newburgh, R. Reeves, I. K. Wehus, J. T. L. Zwart, L. Bronfman, R., Bustos, S. E. Church, C. Dickinson, H. K. Eriksen

TL;DR
This paper reports measurements of the CMB polarization power spectrum at 95 GHz from QUIET, constraining primordial gravitational waves and confirming consistency with LCDM, with systematic errors below r=0.01.
Contribution
First measurement of the CMB polarization power spectrum at 95 GHz using QUIET, with dual analysis pipelines and improved systematic error constraints.
Findings
EE spectrum consistent with LCDM
BB spectrum consistent with zero
Tensor-to-scalar ratio constrained to r<0.01
Abstract
The Q/U Imaging ExperimenT (QUIET) has observed the cosmic microwave background (CMB) at 43 and 95GHz. The 43-GHz results have been published in QUIET Collaboration et al. (2011), and here we report the measurement of CMB polarization power spectra using the 95-GHz data. This data set comprises 5337 hours of observations recorded by an array of 84 polarized coherent receivers with a total array sensitivity of 87 uK sqrt(s). Four low-foreground fields were observed, covering a total of ~1000 square degrees with an effective angular resolution of 12.8', allowing for constraints on primordial gravitational waves and high-signal-to-noise measurements of the E-modes across three acoustic peaks. The data reduction was performed using two independent analysis pipelines, one based on a pseudo-Cl (PCL) cross-correlation approach, and the other on a maximum-likelihood (ML) approach. All data…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
