Planck intermediate results. VII. Statistical properties of infrared and radio extragalactic sources from the Planck Early Release Compact Source Catalogue at frequencies between 100 and 857 GHz
Planck Collaboration: P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, F. Arg\"ueso, M., Arnaud, M. Ashdown, F. Atrio-Barandela, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, A. Balbi,, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, E. Battaner, K. Benabed, A. Beno\^it, J.-P., Bernard, M. Bersanelli, M. Bethermin, R. Bhatia, A. Bonaldi

TL;DR
This study uses Planck data to analyze the statistical properties, number counts, and spectral indices of extragalactic infrared and radio sources across multiple frequencies, providing new counts and insights into galaxy populations.
Contribution
It presents the first counts of bright sources from 353 to 857GHz and distinguishes between dust-dominated and synchrotron-dominated sources using Planck data.
Findings
Number counts are in the Euclidean regime.
Dusty sources dominate at higher frequencies, synchrotron at lower.
Current models poorly reproduce submillimetre counts.
Abstract
(abridged for arXiv) We make use of the Planck all-sky survey to derive number counts and spectral indices of extragalactic sources -- infrared and radio sources -- from the Planck Early Catalogue (ERCSC) at 100 to 857GHz. Our sample contains, after the 80% completeness cut, between 122 and 452 and sources, with flux densities above 0.3 and 1.9Jy at 100 and 857GHz, over about 31 to 40% of the sky. Using Planck HFI, all the sources have been classified as either dust-dominated or synchrotron-dominated on the basis of their spectral energy distributions (SED). Our sample is thus complete, flux-limited and color-selected to differentiate between the two populations. We find an approximately equal number of synchrotron and dusty sources between 217 and 353GHz; at 353GHz or higher (or 217GHz and lower) frequencies, the number is dominated by dusty (synchrotron) sources, as expected. For most…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
