The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Cross-Correlation of CMB Lensing and Quasars
Blake D. Sherwin, Sudeep Das, Amir Hajian, Graeme Addison, J. Richard, Bond, Devin Crichton, Mark J. Devlin, Joanna Dunkley, Megan B. Gralla, Mark, Halpern, J. Colin Hill, Adam D. Hincks, John P. Hughes, Kevin Huffenberger,, Renee Hlozek, Arthur Kosowsky, Thibaut Louis

TL;DR
This paper reports the first detection of the cross-correlation between CMB lensing maps from the Atacama Cosmology Telescope and quasar maps from SDSS, confirming that quasars trace high-redshift mass distribution and demonstrating the potential of this method for astrophysical studies.
Contribution
It presents the first measurement of the CMB lensing-quasar cross-power spectrum and uses it to estimate quasar bias at high redshift, showing the method's promise for future research.
Findings
Detected CMB lensing-quasar cross-correlation at 3.8 sigma significance.
Measured quasar bias at z ~ 1.4 as b = 2.5 +/- 0.6.
Confirmed quasars trace mass distribution at high redshifts.
Abstract
We measure the cross-correlation of Atacama Cosmology Telescope CMB lensing convergence maps with quasar maps made from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey DR8 SDSS-XDQSO photometric catalog. The CMB lensing-quasar cross-power spectrum is detected for the first time at a significance of 3.8 sigma, which directly confirms that the quasar distribution traces the mass distribution at high redshifts z>1. Our detection passes a number of null tests and systematic checks. Using this cross-power spectrum, we measure the amplitude of the linear quasar bias assuming a template for its redshift dependence, and find the amplitude to be consistent with an earlier measurement from clustering; at redshift z ~ 1.4, the peak of the distribution of quasars in our maps, our measurement corresponds to a bias of b = 2.5 +/- 0.6. With the signal-to-noise ratio on CMB lensing measurements likely to improve by an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
