Microwave emissivity of freshwater ice, Part II: Modelling the Great Bear and Great Slave Lakes
Peter Mills

TL;DR
This study models microwave emissivity of freshwater ice on Great Bear and Great Slave Lakes, demonstrating high accuracy outside melt seasons and highlighting the need to address biases during melt periods.
Contribution
It introduces a combined modeling approach using CLIMo and radiative transfer to predict ice emissivity, improving understanding of microwave signatures of lake ice.
Findings
Strong correlation (0.926) at 18 GHz during non-melt seasons
Model residual of 0.78 Kelvin at 18 GHz
Biases observed during melt season due to snow dirt content
Abstract
Lake ice within three Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer on EOS (AMSR-E) pixels over the Great Bear and Great Slave Lakes have been simulated with the Canadian Lake Ice Model (CLIMo). The resulting thicknesses and temperatures were fed to a radiative transfer-based ice emissivity model and compared to the satellite measurements at three frequencies---6.925 GHz, 10.65 GHz and 18.7 GHz. Excluding the melt season, the model was found to have strong predictive power, returning a correlation of 0.926 and a residual of 0.78 Kelvin at 18 GHz, vertical polarization. Discrepencies at melt season are thought to be caused by the presence of dirt in the snow cover which makes the microwave signature more like soil rather than ice. Except at 18 GHz, all results showed significant bias compared to measured values. Further work needs to be done to determine the source of this bias.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics · Climate change and permafrost · Cryospheric studies and observations
