First-principles transport calculation method based on real-space finite-difference nonequilibrium Green's function scheme
Tomoya Ono, Yoshiyuki Egami, and Kikuji Hirose

TL;DR
This paper introduces an efficient real-space finite-difference nonequilibrium Green's function method for quantum transport calculations, reducing computational effort while accurately modeling electron transport in nanostructures.
Contribution
The authors develop a novel procedure using ratio matrices and boundary-matching techniques to efficiently compute self-energy terms and Green's functions in real-space transport calculations.
Findings
The method significantly reduces computational time for self-energy calculations.
The approach accurately captures wave function symmetry effects on electron transport.
Application to BN ring and carbon nanotubes demonstrates the method's effectiveness.
Abstract
We demonstrate an efficient nonequilibrium Green's function transport calculation procedure based on the real-space finite-difference method. The direct inversion of matrices for obtaining the self-energy terms of electrodes is computationally demanding in the real-space method because the matrix dimension corresponds to the number of grid points in the unit cell of electrodes, which is much larger than that of sites in the tight-binding approach. The procedure using the ratio matrices of the overbridging boundary-matching technique [Phys. Rev. B {\bf 67}, 195315 (2003)], which is related to the wave functions of a couple of grid planes in the matching regions, greatly reduces the computational effort to calculate self-energy terms without losing mathematical strictness. In addition, the present procedure saves computational time to obtain Green's function of the semi-infinite system…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
