General relativistic radiative transfer: formulation and emission from structured tori around black holes
Ziri Younsi, Kinwah Wu, Steven V. Fuerst

TL;DR
This paper develops a covariant general relativistic radiative transfer formulation applicable to complex astrophysical objects, and applies it to study emission properties of structured accretion tori around black holes, revealing significant geometrical and optical effects.
Contribution
The paper introduces a comprehensive, covariant RT formulation for 3D structured objects, enabling detailed modeling of emission from accretion tori around black holes, including optical depth variations and relativistic effects.
Findings
Geometrical effects significantly influence emission images and spectra.
Optically thin tori produce line profiles less dependent on viewing angle.
Gravitational line resonance occurs in 3D accretion flows but not in thin disks.
Abstract
We construct a general relativistic radiative transfer (RT) formulation, applicable to particles with or without mass in astrophysical settings. Derived from first principles, the formulation is manifestly covariant. Absorption and emission, as well as relativistic, geometrical and optical depth effects are treated self-consistently. The RT formulation can handle 3D geometrical settings and structured objects with variations and gradients in the optical depths across the objects and along the line-of-sight. The presence of mass causes the intensity variation along the particle bundle ray to be reduced by an aberration factor. We apply the formulation and demonstrate RT calculations for emission from accretion tori around rotating black holes, considering two cases: idealised optically thick tori that have a sharply defined emission boundary surface, and structured tori that allow…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
