Active Model Selection
Omid Madani, Daniel J. Lizotte, Russell Greiner

TL;DR
This paper introduces and analyzes the simplified active model selection problem, focusing on choosing the best model with limited probes, and compares various algorithms including new proposals through theoretical and empirical evaluation.
Contribution
It formalizes the budgeted active model selection problem, proves its NP-hardness, and evaluates multiple algorithms, including novel ones, for effective model identification.
Findings
Biased-Robin algorithm outperforms others in identical cost and prior scenarios.
The problem is NP-hard in general.
Empirical results demonstrate effectiveness of proposed algorithms.
Abstract
Classical learning assumes the learner is given a labeled data sample, from which it learns a model. The field of Active Learning deals with the situation where the learner begins not with a training sample, but instead with resources that it can use to obtain information to help identify the optimal model. To better understand this task, this paper presents and analyses the simplified "(budgeted) active model selection" version, which captures the pure exploration aspect of many active learning problems in a clean and simple problem formulation. Here the learner can use a fixed budget of "model probes" (where each probe evaluates the specified model on a random indistinguishable instance) to identify which of a given set of possible models has the highest expected accuracy. Our goal is a policy that sequentially determines which model to probe next, based on the information observed so…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning and Algorithms · Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research · Machine Learning and Data Classification
