Planck Intermediate Results. V. Pressure profiles of galaxy clusters from the Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect
Planck Collaboration: P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown,, F. Atrio-Barandela, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, A. Balbi, A. J. Banday, R. B., Barreiro, J. G. Bartlett, E. Battaner, K. Benabed, A. Benoit, J.-P. Bernard,, M. Bersanelli, R. Bhatia, I. Bikmaev, H. Boehringer

TL;DR
This study uses Planck satellite data to analyze the pressure profiles of 62 galaxy clusters via the Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect, confirming consistency with X-ray data and theoretical models, and providing insights into gas distribution in clusters.
Contribution
First detailed pressure profiles of galaxy clusters derived from Planck SZ data, extending measurements out to 3 R500 and comparing with X-ray and theoretical models.
Findings
Pressure profiles agree with X-ray measurements within R500.
Average pressure profile is slightly flatter than some simulations at large radii.
Gas mass fraction profiles are consistent with cosmic baryon fraction.
Abstract
Taking advantage of the all-sky coverage and broad frequency range of the Planck satellite, we study the Sunyaev-Zeldovich (SZ) and pressure profiles of 62 nearby massive clusters detected at high significance in the 14-month nominal survey. Careful reconstruction of the SZ signal indicates that most clusters are individually detected at least out to R500. By stacking the radial profiles, we have statistically detected the radial SZ signal out to 3 x R500, i.e., at a density contrast of about 50-100, though the dispersion about the mean profile dominates the statistical errors across the whole radial range. Our measurement is fully consistent with previous Planck results on integrated SZ fluxes, further strengthening the agreement between SZ and X-ray measurements inside R500. Correcting for the effects of the Planck beam, we have calculated the corresponding pressure profiles. This new…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
