Cuspidal representations of $GL(n,F)$ distinguished by a maximal Levi subgroup, with $F$ a non-archimedean local field
Nadir Matringe

TL;DR
This paper characterizes when cuspidal representations of GL(n,F) over a non-archimedean local field are distinguished by a maximal Levi subgroup, showing such representations only occur when n is even and the subgroup is a product of two GL(n/2,F).
Contribution
It proves a precise criterion for the distinguishedness of cuspidal representations of GL(n,F) by a maximal Levi subgroup, specifically identifying the structure of the subgroup and the parity of n.
Findings
Cuspidal representations are distinguished only when n is even.
The maximal Levi subgroup must be isomorphic to GL(n/2,F)×GL(n/2,F).
Distinguishedness imposes strict structural conditions on the representation and subgroup.
Abstract
Let is a cuspidal representation of , with a non archimedean local field, and a maximal Levi subgroup of . We show that if is -distinguished, then is even, and .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Algebra and Geometry · Finite Group Theory Research · Advanced Topics in Algebra
