Numerical modeling of the disruption of Comet D/1993 F2 Shoemaker-Levy 9 representing the progenitor by a gravitationally bound assemblage of randomly shaped polyhedra
Naor Movshovitz (1), Erik Asphaug (1), Donald Korycansky (1) ((1), University of California, Santa Cruz)

TL;DR
This study models the tidal disruption of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 using advanced numerical codes that treat the progenitor as a collection of randomly shaped polyhedra, revealing insights into its structure and disruption process.
Contribution
First application of polyhedral rubble-pile modeling to simulate the tidal breakup of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9, incorporating realistic shapes and forces for improved accuracy.
Findings
Progenitor was a rubble-pile about 1.5 km in diameter.
Realistic fragment shapes increase disruption difficulty due to grain locking.
Estimated bulk density of the comet is 300-400 kg/m^3.
Abstract
We advance the modeling of rubble-pile solid bodies by re-examining the tidal breakup of comet Shoemaker-Levy 9, an event that occurred during a 1.33 Jupiter radii encounter with that planet in July 1992. Tidal disruption of the comet nucleus led to a chain of sub-nuclei about 100-1000 m in diameter; these went on to collide with the planet two years later (Chodas & Yeomans 1996). They were intensively studied prior to and during the collisions, making SL9 the best natural benchmark for physical models of small body disruption. For the first time in the study of this event, we use numerical codes treating rubble-piles as collections of polyhedra (Korycansky & Asphaug 2009). This introduces forces of dilatation and friction, and inelastic response. As in our previous studies (Asphaug & Benz 1994,1996) we conclude that the progenitor must have been a rubble-pile, and we obtain…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
