Spectroscopic failures in photometric redshift calibration: cosmological biases and survey requirements
Carlos E. Cunha (KIPAC-Stanford), Dragan Huterer (Michigan), Huan Lin, (Fermilab), Michael T. Busha (Zurich), Risa H. Wechsler (KIPAC-Stanford,, SLAC)

TL;DR
This study uses simulations to assess how spectroscopic redshift errors and incompleteness affect cosmological measurements from weak lensing, highlighting the importance of accurate redshifts and effective error estimation methods.
Contribution
It demonstrates that neural network-based modeling can mitigate spectroscopic incompleteness effects, but redshift inaccuracies significantly bias cosmological results, emphasizing the need for precise redshift calibration.
Findings
Spectroscopic incompleteness does not significantly bias cosmology.
Incorrect redshifts cause severe biases exceeding 1%.
Photo-z error estimators can reduce cosmological biases.
Abstract
We use N-body-spectro-photometric simulations to investigate the impact of incompleteness and incorrect redshifts in spectroscopic surveys to photometric redshift training and calibration and the resulting effects on cosmological parameter estimation from weak lensing shear-shear correlations. The photometry of the simulations is modeled after the upcoming Dark Energy Survey and the spectroscopy is based on a low/intermediate resolution spectrograph with wavelength coverage of 5500{\AA} < {\lambda} < 9500{\AA}. The principal systematic errors that such a spectroscopic follow-up encounters are incompleteness (inability to obtain spectroscopic redshifts for certain galaxies) and wrong redshifts. Encouragingly, we find that a neural network-based approach can effectively describe the spectroscopic incompleteness in terms of the galaxies' colors, so that the spectroscopic selection can be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
