On the contact values of the density profiles in an electric double layer using density functional theory
L. B. Bhuiyan, D. Henderson, S. Soko{\l}owski

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the accuracy of density functional theory in predicting contact values of ion distributions in an electric double layer, using a recently proposed contact value theorem and Monte Carlo data for validation.
Contribution
It applies a new local second contact value theorem to assess the contact behavior of electrode-ion distributions predicted by density functional theory, comparing with simulation data.
Findings
Theoretical contact values agree semi-quantitatively with simulations.
Product of co- and counterion contact values shows qualitative agreement with deviations at higher concentrations.
The approach provides a reasonable assessment of density functional theory predictions for electric double layers.
Abstract
A recently proposed local second contact value theorem [Henderson D., Boda D., J. Electroanal. Chem., 2005, 582, 16] for the charge profile of an electric double layer is used in conjunction with the existing Monte Carlo data from the literature to assess the contact behavior of the electrode-ion distributions predicted by the density functional theory. The results for the contact values of the co- and counterion distributions and their product are obtained for the symmetric valency, restricted primitive model planar double layer for a range of electrolyte concentrations and temperatures. Overall, the theoretical results satisfy the second contact value theorem reasonably well, the agreement with the simulations being semi-quantitative or better. The product of the co- and counterion contact values as a function of the electrode surface charge density is qualitative with the simulations…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
