An independent, general method for checking consistency between diffraction data and partial radial distribution functions derived from them: the example of liquid water
Z. Steinczinger, L. Pusztai

TL;DR
This paper presents a simple, general method based on Reverse Monte Carlo modeling to verify the consistency between experimental diffraction data and derived partial radial distribution functions, demonstrated on liquid water.
Contribution
It introduces a novel, independent approach for checking the consistency of diffraction data with partial radial distribution functions, applicable to disordered systems like liquids.
Findings
Neutron diffraction data fully consistent with all partials for D2O.
X-ray diffraction data reveals issues with the O-O partial radial distribution function.
Method can assess the validity of partials from statistical theories.
Abstract
There are various routes for deriving partial radial distribution functions of disordered systems from experimental diffraction (and/or EXAFS) data. Due to limitations and errors of experimental data, as well as to imperfections of the evaluation procedures, it is of primary importance to confirm that the end result (partial radial distribution functions) and the primary information (diffraction data) are consistent with each other. We introduce a simple approach, based on Reverse Monte Carlo modelling, that is capable of assessing this dilemma. As a demonstration, we use the most frequently cited set of "experimental" partial radial distribution functions on liquid water and investigate whether the 3 partials (O-O, O-H and H-H) are consistent with the total structure factor of pure liquid D_2O from neutron diffraction and that of H_2O from X-ray diffraction. We find that while neutron…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
