Skand theory and its applications. (A new look at non-well-founded sets)
Ju. T. Lisica

TL;DR
This paper introduces skand theory, a new mathematical framework for non-well-founded sets, offering fresh insights into set reflexivity, paradoxes, and generalized continuum concepts.
Contribution
It develops the concept of skands, clarifies set reflexivity, resolves Russell's paradox via maximality, and constructs generalized real numbers and continua.
Findings
Skands include well-founded sets and hyper-classes.
Self-similar skands are always reflexive.
Russell's paradox is addressed through maximality, not contradiction.
Abstract
A new mathematical object called a skand is introduced, which turns out in general to be a non-well-founded set. Skands of finite lengths are ordinary well-founded sets, and skands of very long length (like the hyper-skand of all ordinals) are hyper-classes. Self-similar skands are also considered, and they clarify the reflexivity of sets, i.e., the meaning of the relation X is a member of X; in particular, self-similar skands considered as non-well-founded sets are always reflexive, but not vice versa. The existence of self-similar skands shows at once that Russell's well-known paradox is not a paradox at all. The inconsistency of Russell's "set" R, which is the collection of all sets that are not members of themselves, is proved here not with the help of Russell's paradox (as it is traditionally given, which is incorrect), but via a simple method of the maximality (universality) of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
