TL;DR
This paper analyzes whether dividing data streams among few users or many users with multiple receive antennas yields better performance in downlink multi-antenna systems, concluding that many users with one stream each is generally optimal.
Contribution
The paper provides an analytic comparison of data stream allocation strategies, demonstrating that multi-user diversity and receive combining outperform multi-stream per user approaches under realistic conditions.
Findings
Selecting many users with one stream each enhances resilience to spatial correlation.
Receive combining offers larger benefits from multi-user diversity.
The results simplify system design by favoring user selection strategies.
Abstract
In downlink multi-antenna systems with many users, the multiplexing gain is strictly limited by the number of transmit antennas and the use of these antennas. Assuming that the total number of receive antennas at the multi-antenna users is much larger than , the maximal multiplexing gain can be achieved with many different transmission/reception strategies. For example, the excess number of receive antennas can be utilized to schedule users with effective channels that are near-orthogonal, for multi-stream multiplexing to users with well-conditioned channels, and/or to enable interference-aware receive combining. In this paper, we try to answer the question if the data streams should be divided among few users (many streams per user) or many users (few streams per user, enabling receive combining). Analytic results are derived to show how user selection, spatial correlation,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
