Calibrating Convective properties of Solar-like Stars in the Kepler Field of View
Ana Bonaca, Joel D. Tanner, Sarbani Basu, William J. Chaplin, Travis, S. Metcalfe, M\'ario J. P. F. G. Monteiro, J\'er\^ome Ballot, Timothy R., Bedding, Alfio Bonanno, Anne-Marie Broomhall, Hans Bruntt, Tiago L. Campante,, J{\o}rgen Christensen-Dalsgaard, Enrico Corsaro

TL;DR
This study uses Kepler data to calibrate the mixing-length parameter for convection in solar-like stars, revealing it varies with metallicity and differs from the solar value, impacting stellar modeling accuracy.
Contribution
It provides the first empirical calibration of the mixing-length parameter for a large sample of stars using Kepler data, showing its dependence on stellar properties.
Findings
The solar-calibrated is often inappropriate for other stars.
The mixing-length parameter is generally lower than the solar value.
increases with stellar metallicity.
Abstract
Stellar models generally use simple parametrizations to treat convection. The most widely used parametrization is the so-called "Mixing Length Theory" where the convective eddy sizes are described using a single number, \alpha, the mixing-length parameter. This is a free parameter, and the general practice is to calibrate \alpha using the known properties of the Sun and apply that to all stars. Using data from NASA's Kepler mission we show that using the solar-calibrated \alpha is not always appropriate, and that in many cases it would lead to estimates of initial helium abundances that are lower than the primordial helium abundance. Kepler data allow us to calibrate \alpha for many other stars and we show that for the sample of stars we have studied, the mixing-length parameter is generally lower than the solar value. We studied the correlation between \alpha and stellar properties,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
