Multi-Wavelength Observations of Supernova 2011ei: Time-Dependent Classification of Type IIb and Ib Supernovae and Implications for their Progenitors
D. Milisavljevic, R. Margutti, A. M. Soderberg, G. Pignata, L., Chomiuk, R. Fesen, F. Bufano, N. E. Sanders, J. T. Parrent, S. Parker, P., Mazzali, E. Pian, T. Pickering, D. Buckley, S. Crawford, A. A. M. Gulbis, C., Hettlage, E. Hooper, K. Nordsieck, D. O'Donoghue, T.-O. Husser

TL;DR
This study presents early multi-wavelength observations of supernova 2011ei, revealing rapid spectral evolution and providing insights into its progenitor's properties and mass-loss history, highlighting the importance of timely observations for accurate classification.
Contribution
It demonstrates that time-dependent spectral changes can bias supernova classifications and shows how multi-wavelength data can infer progenitor characteristics and mass-loss history.
Findings
Rapid spectral metamorphosis from Type II to Ib features.
Presence of high-velocity hydrogen shell in Type Ib supernovae.
Progenitor was a low-mass, compact star with episodic mass loss.
Abstract
We present X-ray, UV/optical, and radio observations of the stripped-envelope, core-collapse supernova (SN) 2011ei, one of the least luminous SNe IIb or Ib observed to date. Our observations begin with a discovery within 1 day of explosion and span several months afterward. Early optical spectra exhibit broad, Type II-like hydrogen Balmer profiles that subside rapidly and are replaced by Type Ib-like He-rich features on the timescale of one week. High-cadence monitoring of this transition suggests that absorption attributable to a high velocity (> 12,000 km/s) H-rich shell is not rare in Type Ib events. Radio observations imply a shock velocity of v = 0.13c and a progenitor star mass-loss rate of 1.4 x 10^{-5} Msun yr^{-1} (assuming wind velocity v_w=10^3 km/s). This is consistent with independent constraints from deep X-ray observations with Swift-XRT and Chandra. Overall, the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
