Reply to M. Mel\'endez and W. G. Hoover [arXiv:1206.0188v2]
Michele Campisi, Fei Zhan, Peter Talkner, and Peter H\"anggi
TL;DR
This paper responds to a critical comment by clarifying that the simulations cited do not disprove but support the authors' original theory, reinforcing its validity.
Contribution
The authors demonstrate that the recent simulations by Meléndez and Hoover actually corroborate their original theoretical work.
Findings
Simulations support the original theory
Critique does not disprove the theory
Original theory remains valid
Abstract
In response to the recent critical comment by M. Mel\'endez and W. G. Hoover [arXiv:1206.0188v2] on our work [M. Campisi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 250601 (2012)], we show that their molecular dynamics simulations do not disprove our theory but in fact convincingly corroborate it.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamics · Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies