
TL;DR
This paper explores how the causal sets approach to quantum gravity exemplifies the benefits of a structuralist interpretation, clarifying the concept of structure in physical theories and addressing related conceptual issues.
Contribution
It demonstrates how structuralism provides a natural interpretation of causal sets and illustrates the importance of rigorous conceptualization of structure in physical theories.
Findings
Structuralism clarifies the physical meaning of causal sets.
Causal sets serve as a clear example of mathematical conceptualization of structure.
Addresses issues in grounding identity in symmetrical physical structures.
Abstract
More often than not, recently popular structuralist interpretations of physical theories leave the central concept of a structure insufficiently precisified. The incipient causal sets approach to quantum gravity offers a paradigmatic case of a physical theory predestined to be interpreted in structuralist terms. It is shown how employing structuralism lends itself to a natural interpretation of the physical meaning of causal sets theory. Conversely, the conceptually exceptionally clear case of causal sets is used as a foil to illustrate how a mathematically informed rigorous conceptualization of structure serves to identify structures in physical theories. Furthermore, a number of technical issues infesting structuralist interpretations of physical theories such as difficulties with grounding the identity of the places of highly symmetrical physical structures in their relational…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
