Qualitative Decision Making Under Possibilistic Uncertainty: Toward more discriminating criteria
Paul Weng

TL;DR
This paper introduces a refined binary possibilistic utility framework that enhances discrimination in qualitative decision making under possibilistic uncertainty, building on and generalizing previous approaches.
Contribution
It provides a new axiomatization of PU, explores its relation with lexicographic utilities, and redefines lotteries to improve decision criterion discrimination.
Findings
Refined binary possibilistic utility is more discriminating.
New axiomatization clarifies PU's foundations.
Enhanced decision criteria improve qualitative decision making.
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to propose a generalization of previous approaches in qualitative decision making. Our work is based on the binary possibilistic utility (PU), which is a possibilistic counterpart of Expected Utility (EU).We first provide a new axiomatization of PU and study its relation with the lexicographic aggregation of pessimistic and optimistic utilities. Then we explain the reasons of the coarseness of qualitative decision criteria. Finally, thanks to a redefinition of possibilistic lotteries and mixtures, we present the refined binary possibilistic utility, which is more discriminating than previously proposed criteria.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMulti-Criteria Decision Making · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
