Probing the Band Topology of Mercury Telluride through Weak Localization and Antilocalization
Viktor Krueckl, Klaus Richter

TL;DR
This paper investigates how weak localization and antilocalization phenomena in HgTe/CdTe quantum wells reveal information about their band topology, showing a transition from WL to WAL linked to the Berry phase and energy-dependent effects.
Contribution
It demonstrates the energy-dependent transition between WL and WAL in HgTe/CdTe quantum wells and links these effects to the underlying band topology and Berry phase signatures.
Findings
Transition from WL to WAL with increasing Fermi energy in inverted band systems
Presence of a Berry phase signature in magnetoconductance profiles
Energy-dependent WAL behavior in quantum wells with inverted band topology
Abstract
We analyze the effect of weak localization (WL) and weak antilocalization (WAL) in the electronic transport through HgTe/CdTe quantum wells. We show that for increasing Fermi energy the magnetoconductance of a diffusive system with inverted band ordering features a transition from WL to WAL and back, if spin-orbit interactions from bulk and structure inversion asymmetry can be neglected. This, and an additional splitting in the magnetoconductance profile, is a signature of the Berry phase arising for inverted band ordering and not present in heterostructures with conventional ordering. In presence of spin-orbit interaction both band topologies exhibit WAL, which is distinctly energy dependent solely for quantum wells with inverted band ordering. This can be explained by an energy-dependent decomposition of the Hamiltonian into two blocks.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
