Nematic and meta-nematic transitions in the iron pnictides

TL;DR

This paper provides thermodynamic evidence that nematic electronic phases in BaFe2(As1-xPx)2 develop above structural transitions, persist into the superconducting regime, and are driven by electronic interactions, revealing a phase diagram similar to cuprates.

Contribution

It introduces the concept of a meta-nematic transition and demonstrates the existence of an extended nematic phase above the superconducting dome in iron pnictides.

Findings

Nematicity develops above the structural transition temperature.

Identification of a true nematic transition at T* and a meta-nematic transition at Ts.

Nematic phase persists into the nonmagnetic superconducting regime.

Abstract

Strongly interacting electrons can exhibit novel collective phases, among which the electronic nematic phases are perhaps the most surprising as they spontaneously break rotational symmetry of the underlying crystal lattice. The electron nematicity has been recently observed in the iron-pnictide and cuprate high-temperature superconductors. Whether such a tendency of electrons to self-organise unidirectionally has a common feature in these superconductors is, however, a highly controversial issue. In the cuprates, the nematicity has been suggested as a possible source of the pseudogap phase, whilst in the iron-pnictides, it has been commonly associated with the tetragonal-to-orthorhombic structural phase transition at $T_s$. Here, we provide the first thermodynamic evidence in BaFe2(As1-xPx)2 that the nematicity develops well above the structural transition and persists to the nonmagnetic superconducting regime, resulting in a new phase diagram strikingly similar to the pseudogap phase diagram in the cuprates. Our highly sensitive magnetic anisotropy measurements using microcantilever torque-magnetometry under in-plane field rotation reveal pronounced two-fold oscillations, which break the tetragonal symmetry. Combined with complementary high-resolution synchrotron X-ray and resistivity measurements, our results consistently identify two distinct temperatures - one at $T^{\ast}$, signifying a true nematic transition, and the other at $T_s (< T^{\ast})$, which we show to be not a true phase transition, but rather what we refer to as a "meta-nematic transition", in analogy to the well-known metamagnetic transition in the theory of magnetism. Our observation of the extended nematic phase above the superconducting dome establishes that the nematicity has primarily an electronic origin, inherent in the normal state of high-temperature superconductors.