
TL;DR
This paper introduces the max-folding number of a graph, explores its computational complexity, and provides exact values for specific graph classes, revealing NP-completeness in general.
Contribution
It defines the max-folding number, proves its NP-completeness for various graph classes, and determines its value for trees.
Findings
Max-folding number of trees is two.
Determining the max-folding number is NP-complete for certain graph classes.
Maximal foldings lead to a disjoint union of cliques with minimal clique number equal to the chromatic number.
Abstract
Let G be a graph. Consider two nonadjacent vertices x and y that have a common neighbor. Folding G with respect to x and y is the operation which identifies x and y. After a maximal series of foldings the graph is a disjoint union of cliques. The minimal clique number that can appear after a maximal series of foldings is equal to the chromatic number of G. In this paper we consider the problem to determine the maximal clique number which can appear after a maximal series of foldings. We denote this number as Sigma(G) and we call it the max-folding number. We show that the problem is NP-complete, even when restricted to classes such as trivially perfect graphs, cobipartite graphs and planar graphs. We show that the max-folding number of trees is two.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Theory Research · Graph theory and applications · Graph Labeling and Dimension Problems
