Baryons Matter: Why Luminous Satellite Galaxies Have Reduced Central Masses
Adi Zolotov, Alyson M. Brooks, Beth Willman, Fabio Governato, Andrew, Pontzen, Charlotte Christensen, Avishai Dekel, Tom Quinn, Sijing Shen, James, Wadsley

TL;DR
High resolution cosmological simulations show that supernova feedback and tidal stripping significantly reduce the central masses of luminous satellite galaxies, aligning theoretical models more closely with observed properties.
Contribution
This work introduces a physically motivated model linking star formation to molecular gas, demonstrating how baryonic processes lower satellite galaxy central masses compared to dark matter-only simulations.
Findings
Supernova feedback reduces dark matter densities in massive progenitors.
Tidal stripping further decreases central densities after satellite infall.
DM-only simulations overestimate satellite central masses without baryonic effects.
Abstract
Using high resolution cosmological hydrodynamical simulations of Milky Way-massed disk galaxies, we demonstrate that supernovae feedback and tidal stripping lower the central masses of bright (-15 < M_V < -8) satellite galaxies. These simulations resolve high density regions, comparable to giant molecular clouds, where stars form. This resolution allows us to adopt a prescription for H_2 formation and destruction that ties star formation to the presence of shielded, molecular gas. Before infall, supernova feedback from the clumpy, bursty star formation captured by this physically motivated model leads to reduced dark matter (DM) densities and shallower inner density profiles in the massive satellite progenitors (Mvir > 10^9 Msun, Mstar > 10^7 Msun) compared to DM-only simulations. The progenitors of the lower mass satellites are unable to maintain bursty star formation histories, due to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
