A group-galaxy cross-correlation function analysis in zCOSMOS
C. Knobel, S. J. Lilly, C. M. Carollo, T. Contini, J.-P. Kneib, O. Le, Fevre, V. Mainieri, A. Renzini, M. Scodeggio, G. Zamorani, S. Bardelli, M., Bolzonella, A. Bongiorno, K. Caputi, O. Cucciati, S. de la Torre, L. de, Ravel, P. Franzetti, B. Garilli, A. Iovino, P. Kampczyk

TL;DR
This study analyzes the clustering of galaxy groups in the zCOSMOS survey to test the consistency between observed clustering strength and mass estimates, revealing generally good agreement but highlighting anomalies at high redshift.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed cross-correlation analysis of galaxy groups in zCOSMOS, linking clustering bias to mass estimates and testing for systematic errors with mock catalogs.
Findings
Bias increases with group richness as expected.
Mass estimates from bias are consistent with richness-based estimates.
Anomalously high bias in the richest high-redshift groups suggests large-scale structure effects.
Abstract
We present a group-galaxy cross-correlation analysis using a group catalog produced from the 16,500 spectra from the optical zCOSMOS galaxy survey. Our aim is to perform a consistency test in the redshift range 0.2 < z < 0.8 between the clustering strength of the groups and mass estimates that are based on the richness of the groups. We measure the linear bias of the groups by means of a group-galaxy cross-correlation analysis and convert it into mass using the bias-mass relation for a given cosmology, checking the systematic errors using realistic group and galaxy mock catalogs. The measured bias for the zCOSMOS groups increases with group richness as expected by the theory of cosmic structure formation and yields masses that are reasonably consistent with the masses estimated from the richness directly, considering the scatter that is obtained from the 24 mock catalogs. An exception…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
