Direct and Indirect Effects of Sequential Treatments
Vanessa Didelez, Philip Dawid, Sara Geneletti

TL;DR
This paper reviews the concept of direct causal effects, reformulating it without counterfactuals, and explores conditions for identifiability in sequential treatments using graphical methods.
Contribution
It introduces a counterfactual-free formulation of direct effects and extends the concept to sequential treatments with new identifiability conditions.
Findings
Counterfactual-free formulation of direct effects
Graphical criteria for identifiability of sequential treatments
Comparison with existing criteria by Pearl and Robins
Abstract
In this paper we review the notion of direct causal effect as introduced by Pearl (2001). We show how it can be formulated without counterfactuals, using intervention indicators instead. This allows to consider the natural direct effect as a special case of sequential treatments discussed by Dawid and Didelez (2005) which immediately yields conditions for identifiability as well as a graphical way of checking identifiability. The results are contrasted with the criteria given by Pearl (2001) and Robins (2003).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Advanced Causal Inference Techniques · Statistical Methods and Inference
