Cutset Sampling with Likelihood Weighting
Bozhena Bidyuk, Rina Dechter

TL;DR
This paper presents a novel likelihood weighting method on cutsets in Bayesian networks, reducing sample complexity and improving efficiency by leveraging network structure and caching techniques.
Contribution
It extends cutset sampling principles to likelihood weighting, demonstrating theoretical and empirical improvements in convergence and rejection rates.
Findings
LWLC requires fewer samples for convergence.
LWLC has a lower rejection rate than standard LW.
Caching sampling distributions enhances LWLC performance.
Abstract
The paper analyzes theoretically and empirically the performance of likelihood weighting (LW) on a subset of nodes in Bayesian networks. The proposed scheme requires fewer samples to converge due to reduction in sampling variance. The method exploits the structure of the network to bound the complexity of exact inference used to compute sampling distributions, similar to Gibbs cutset sampling. Yet, the extension of the previosly proposed cutset sampling principles to likelihood weighting is non-trivial due to differences in the sampling processes of Gibbs sampler and LW. We demonstrate empirically that likelihood weighting on a cutset (LWLC) is effective time-wise and has a lower rejection rate than LW when applied to networks with many deterministic probabilities. Finally, we show that the performance of likelihood weighting on a cutset can be improved further by caching computed…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Data Management and Algorithms · Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
