Security proof of the unbalanced phase-encoded BB84 protocol
Agnes Ferenczi, Varun Narasimhachar, Norbert L\"utkenhaus

TL;DR
This paper provides a security proof for the unbalanced phase-encoded BB84 quantum key distribution protocol, accounting for realistic losses in the interferometer, and shows that loss impacts the key rate and security guarantees.
Contribution
It introduces a security proof for the unbalanced phase-encoded BB84 protocol, extending security analysis to practical, lossy implementations.
Findings
The key rate is reduced compared to the ideal BB84 protocol.
Loss in the phase modulator affects the security and must be considered.
Security can be maintained despite unbalanced amplitudes with proper analysis.
Abstract
In optical implementations of the phase-encoded BB84 protocol, the bit information is usually encoded in the phase of two consecutive photon pulses generated in a Mach-Zehnder interferometer. In the actual experimental realization, the loss in the arms of the Mach-Zehnder interferometer is not balanced, for example because only one arm contains a lossy phase modulator. Therefore, the amplitudes of the pulses is not balanced, and the structure of the signals and measurements no longer corresponds to the (balanced) ideal BB84 protocol. Hence, the BB84 security analysis no longer applies in this scenario. We provide a security proof of the unbalanced phase-encoded BB84. The resulting key rate turns out to be lower than the key rate of the ideal BB84 protocol. Therefore, in order to guarantee security, the loss due to the phase modulator cannot be ignored.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
