Microscopic Study of the Isoscalar Giant Monopole Resonance in Cd, Sn and Pb Isotopes
Li-Gang Cao (1,2,3), H. Sagawa (2,4), G. Colo (5,6) ((1) Institute of, Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Science, Lanzhou, P.R. China, (2) Center, for Mathematics, Physics, University of Aizu, Aizu-Wakamatsu, Fukushima,, Japan, (3) Center of Theoretical Nuclear Physics

TL;DR
This study investigates the isoscalar giant monopole resonance in Cd, Sn, and Pb isotopes using Skyrme Hartree-Fock+BCS and QRPA models, comparing different parameter sets and pairing forces to experimental data.
Contribution
It systematically analyzes the impact of various Skyrme parameter sets and pairing interactions on ISGMR predictions in multiple isotopes.
Findings
SkP fails to describe ISGMR due to low incompressibility
SLy5 provides reasonable ISGMR description for Cd and Pb
SkM* yields better results for Sn isotopes
Abstract
The isoscalar giant monopole resonance (ISGMR) in Cd, Sn and Pb isotopes has been studied within the self-consistent Skyrme Hartree-Fock+BCS and quasi-particle random phase approximation (QRPA). Three Skyrme parameter sets are used in the calculations, i.e., SLy5, SkM* and SkP, since they are characterized by different values of the compression modulus in symmetric nuclear matter, namely K=230, 217, and 202 MeV, respectively. We also investigate the effect of different types of pairing forces on the ISGMR in Cd, Sn and Pb isotopes. The calculated peak energies and the strength distributions of ISGMR are compared with available experimental data. We find that SkP fails completely to describe the ISGMR strength distribution for all isotopes due to its low value of the nuclear matter incompressibility, namely K=202 MeV. On the other hand, the SLy5 parameter set, supplemented by an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
